Decent Project

Quick Look • Barlow penned his bold and controversial take on the future of the Internet 30 years ago. • Many of Barlow's predictions about the capabilities of the Internet to remain free have not panned out and unforseen threats have cropped up. • But, it's hard not to feel his central thesis can still be achieved—though perhaps, only if you chose it.

Today marks 30 years since John Perry Barlow—co-founder of the Electronic Frontier Foundation—opened his laptop at the 1996 Economic World Forum in Davos and penned an unforgiving declaration of independence for the Internet.

Now, three decades later, as the Internet has come to dominate our lives and is in a crucial period of transition, it's a good time to reflect on Barlow's early vision of the Internet and how it might guide the Internet's future.

There are, no doubt, many parts of his declaration that simply haven't come true, but I can't help thinking that the spirit of Barlow's message can be achieved—at least for those who might be willing to seize it.

A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace by John Perry Barlow, February 8, 1996

Quick Look
• The FBI raid on Washington Post reporter’s home shows uncertainty about biometrics under the Fifth Amendment.
• Hannah Natanson was compelled to unlock a MacBook with her fingerprint.
• Until the law is clarified, use PINs/passwords instead of biometrics.

Recently, the FBI served a search warrant on the home of Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson.

It's rightfully being decried as yet another disturbing attack by the Trump Administration on America's tradition of free and independent press—a tradition that was dealt yet another blow this week when the Administration arrested four Black journalists in Minnesota, one of whom was former CNN anchor Don Lemon.

While much ink has been spilled about the potential chilling effect the raid on Natanson's home may have, some key details of the search are now coming to light.

Authorities seized several devices from Natanson's home

In court filings, the federal government has now detailed the devices seized from Natanson's home, which included two laptops, a cell phone, an audio recorder, a hard drive, and a smartwatch.

There is a saying in cryptocurrency: “not your keys; not your coins.”

In essence, if you don't control the keys to the wallet containing the cryptocurrency—usually a series of random words generated at the time that the wallet is created—then you don't really own the money inside it.

It's the difference between having your money in a bank that actually possesses your cash and lets you access it, or in an impenetrable safe where only you know the combination. If you possess the cash and the safe, you truly own the money.

The same can be said for encryption.

There are a lot of positives to using biometrics on your devices. It's hard to deny their convenience and in some ways, avoiding passwords can be a good thing since they can be forgotten or stolen.

But the law doesn't necessarily treat your fingerprint the same as a PIN code or password when it comes to unlocking your device. This means you could be compelled to unlock your phone or computer depending on which unlock method you use.

They show up in U.S. neighborhoods around the country dressed like a paramilitary organization—tactical vests, camouflage, and assault rifles—illegally detaining and arresting U.S. citizens, and scanning the faces of anyone who might criticize or confront them.

And perhaps worst of all, they show up wearing masks or balaclavas, concealing their identity, and refusing to identify themselves when asked.